首页> 外文OA文献 >Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research:a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example
【2h】

Supporting the use of theory in cross-country health services research:a participatory qualitative approach using Normalisation Process Theory as an example

机译:支持理论在跨国卫生服务研究中的应用:以归一化过程理论为例的参与式定性方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives To describe and reflect on the process of designing and delivering a training programme supporting the use of theory, in this case Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), in a multisite cross-country health services research study. Design Participatory research approach using qualitative methods. Setting Six European primary care settings involving research teams from Austria, England, Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands and Scotland. Participants RESTORE research team consisting of 8 project applicants, all senior primary care academics, and 10 researchers. Professional backgrounds included general practitioners/family doctors, social/cultural anthropologists, sociologists and health services/primary care researchers. Primary outcome measures Views of all research team members (n=18) were assessed using qualitative evaluation methods, analysed qualitatively by the trainers after each session. Results Most of the team had no experience of using NPT and many had not applied theory to prospective, qualitative research projects. Early training proved didactic and overloaded participants with information. Drawing on RESTORE’s methodological approach of Participatory Learning and Action, workshops using role play, experiential interactive exercises and light-hearted examples not directly related to the study subject matter were developed. Evaluation showed the study team quickly grew in knowledge and confidence in applying theory to fieldwork. Recommendations applicable to other studies include: accepting that theory application is not a linear process, that time is needed to address researcher concerns with the process, and that experiential, interactive learning is a key device in building conceptual and practical knowledge. An unanticipated benefit was the smooth transition to cross-country qualitative coding of study data. Conclusion A structured programme of training enhanced and supported the prospective application of a theory, NPT, to our work but raised challenges. These were not unique to NPT but could arise with the application of any theory, especially in large multisite, international projects. The lessons learnt are applicable to other theoretically informed studies.
机译:目的描述和反思在多站点越野保健服务研究中设计和提供支持理论使用的培训计划的过程,在这种情况下为规范化过程理论(NPT)。使用定性方法设计参与性研究方法。设置六种欧洲初级保健设置,涉及来自奥地利,英国,希腊,爱尔兰,荷兰和苏格兰的研究团队。参与者RESTORE研究团队由8个项目申请人,所有高级初级护理学者和10名研究人员组成。专业背景包括全科医生/家庭医生,社会/文化人类学家,社会学家和卫生服务/初级保健研究人员。主要结局指标使用定性评估方法评估所有研究团队成员(n = 18)的观点,并在每次培训后由培训师进行定性分析。结果团队中的大多数人都没有使用NPT的经验,许多人没有将理论应用于前瞻性,定性研究项目。早期培训证明是有说服力的,并且参与者信息过多。利用RESTORE的参与式学习和行动的方法学方法,开发了使用角色扮演,体验式互动练习和与研究主题没有直接关系的轻松实例的讲习班。评估显示,研究团队对将理论应用于野外工作的知识和信心迅速增强。适用于其他研究的建议包括:接受理论应用不是线性过程,需要时间来解决研究人员对该过程的关注,体验式交互式学习是构建概念和实践知识的关键手段。出乎意料的好处是平稳过渡到研究数据的跨国定性编码。结论结构化的培训计划增强了NPT理论在我们工作中的应用前景,但也带来了挑战。这些不是《不扩散核武器条约》所独有的,而是可以通过任何理论的应用而产生的,特别是在大型多站点国际项目中。所汲取的教训适用于其他理论上有根据的研究。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号